Services

Planning a Move to Next.js

If the first question is how to move a legacy platform or older front end to Next.js safely, start with the architecture, route, content, and release decisions that decide whether the move holds up.

Plan a Next.js migration from React, WordPress, Gatsby, Drupal, Shopify, or another legacy front end without putting routes, content, or search visibility at risk.

Short Answer

A Next.js migration can become risky when the visible front end changes before the unglamorous details are protected: URL inventory, redirect mapping, canonical mapping, metadata and content parity, internal links, analytics, preview workflows, and search visibility. The right plan depends on what you are leaving, why it became hard to maintain, and how much launch risk the business can tolerate.

Why It Matters

During a Next.js migration, I help commercial and delivery teams keep search visibility, editorial continuity, and release confidence intact while routes, templates, metadata, and publishing workflows change underneath.

Common Situations

  • Replacing a legacy SPA, CMS front end, or hardtomaintain site with Next.js.
  • Modernising an existing Next.js codebase to newer routing patterns.
  • Preserving URLs, content operations, and search visibility during migration.

Choose the source platform or migration shape that is closest to the current estate.

What I Look at First

The migration audit covers current routes, target routes, URL inventory, redirects, canonicals, metadata, content parity, rendered HTML, internal links, sitemap and robots setup, structured data, analytics, Search Console baselines, CMS dependencies, release sequencing, and the routes carrying the most launch risk.

What Usually Changes

  • URL, route, template, content, and publishing dependencies are mapped before the platform changes.
  • Redirect, canonical, metadata, schema, sitemap, and crawl risks are identified before launch.
  • CMS, preview, build, and deployment behaviour are compared across the old and new stack.
  • Launch actions are prioritised by visibility, revenue exposure, and delivery risk.
  • The team has a migration plan that reduces avoidable search and release damage.

How This Usually Works

  1. Technical Diagnostic

    A focused review of affected routes, templates, deployment behaviour, crawl signals, CMS behaviour, performance bottlenecks, or code paths, followed by a prioritised fix plan the team can take into delivery.

  2. Embedded Delivery Support

    Senior handson support inside an existing team where architecture, implementation, review, and delivery judgement all matter, especially when the work cannot be handed over as isolated tickets.

  3. Fractional Technical Leadership

    Ongoing senior technical cover for architecture, roadmap, supplier review, delivery risk, hiring shape, and platformownership decisions when the team is not ready to hire permanently.

This May Not Be the Right Fit If

  • You already have a tested route, redirect, content, and release plan and only need extra hands to execute it without challenge. If the plan still needs senior delivery judgement inside the team, Embedded Technical Leadership may be a better fit.
  • The migration is expected to ignore search visibility, preview trust, content operations, or release risk until after launch. If search visibility is already the main problem, Technical SEO Recovery and Debugging is the better route.

Talk to me about your migration

A short description of the current platform, target Next.js setup, and main migration risk is enough. I'll read it and suggest the next step.

Related Case Studies and Project Work

  1. Screenshot of the Virgin Atlantic & Holidays website; part of John Kavanagh's selected project work.

    A New Headless Platform for Virgin Atlantic & Holidays

    At Virgin Atlantic, migration work sat inside a hightraffic travel estate where sequencing, release control, and frontend stability mattered every week.

    View case study
  2. Screenshot of the Nando’s website; part of John Kavanagh's selected project work.

    A Complete Migration and Replatform for Nando’s

    On Nando’s, moving from Drupal to Next.js and Vercel meant protecting routes, structured content, and searchcritical templates while the platform changed underneath.

    View case study
  3. Screenshot of the IMG Licensing website; part of John Kavanagh's selected project work.

    An All‑New Identity and Website for IMG Licensing

    IMG Licensing's rebuild made publishing structure, page generation, and longterm maintainability simpler rather than heavier.

    View case study