Services

Planning a Move to Next.js

Migration work starts with what must survive the move, not with a new component library. Before choosing templates or routing patterns, the current estate needs a clear inventory of URLs, redirects, content ownership, metadata, analytics, CMS workflows, performance constraints, and the pages carrying commercial risk.

Plan a move to Next.js by identifying which routes, redirects, rendered output, metadata, CMS workflows, analytics, performance paths, and release controls must survive the cutover.

Short Answer

A Next.js migration is risky when the new front end looks ready but the old platform's route contracts, content behaviour, crawlervisible output, workflow assumptions, and release controls have not been carried across. A migration is not mainly a frontend rebuild. It is a route, content, signal, workflow, and releaserisk preservation exercise, with child plans for the source platform that is actually being replaced.

Why It Matters

During a Next.js migration, I help commercial and delivery teams keep search visibility, editorial continuity, and release confidence intact whilst routes, templates, metadata, and publishing workflows change underneath.

Common Situations

  • Replacing a legacy SPA, CMS front end, commerce front end, or hardtomaintain site where routes and content behaviour must remain commercially safe.
  • Choosing the right migration route before platformspecific details from WordPress, Drupal, Gatsby, Shopify, Contentful, or a React SPA turn into one oversized rebuild.
  • Preserving URLs, redirects, metadata, rendered HTML, structured data, CMS workflow, analytics, performance, and release confidence during cutover.
  • At Nando’s, migration planning had to treat URL policy, release risk, technical SEO, structured data, and content operations as part of the same launch path.

Choose the source platform or migration shape that is closest to the current estate. This hub defines the launchrisk model; the child pages handle the platformspecific failure modes.

What I Look at First

  • I start with the current URL inventory, target route model, redirect plan, canonical policy, metadata parity, rendered HTML, structured data, internal links, sitemap, and robots setup, analytics, Search Console baselines, CMS dependencies, release sequencing, and rollback path.
  • The Website Replatforming Risk Register helps separate sourceplatform risk from general launch risk before implementation starts.
  • The Rendered HTML Migration Comparison Worksheet is useful when the risk sits in template output, crawlervisible content, metadata, schema, links, or CMSdriven page data rather than only in route mapping.

What Usually Changes

  • URL, route, template, content, and publishing dependencies are mapped before the platform changes.
  • Redirect, canonical, metadata, schema, sitemap, and crawl risks are identified before launch.
  • CMS, preview, build, and deployment behaviour are compared across the old and new stack.
  • Launch actions are prioritised by visibility, revenue exposure, and delivery risk.
  • The team has a migration plan that reduces avoidable search and release damage.

How This Usually Works

  1. Technical Diagnostic

    A focused review of affected routes, templates, deployment behaviour, crawl signals, CMS behaviour, performance bottlenecks, or code paths, followed by a prioritised fix plan the team can take into delivery.

  2. Embedded Delivery Support

    Senior handson support inside an existing team where architecture, implementation, review, and delivery judgement all matter, especially when the work cannot be handed over as isolated tickets.

  3. Fractional Technical Leadership

    Ongoing senior technical cover for architecture, roadmap, supplier review, delivery risk, hiring shape, and platformownership decisions when the team is not ready to hire permanently.

This May Not Be the Right Fit If

  • You already have a tested route, redirect, content, and release plan and only need extra hands to execute it without challenge. If the plan still needs senior delivery judgement inside the team, Embedded Technical Leadership may be a better fit.
  • The migration is expected to ignore search visibility, preview trust, content operations, or release risk until after launch. If search visibility is already the main problem, Technical SEO Recovery and Debugging is the better route.

Contact me about your migration

A short description of the current platform, target Next.js setup, and main migration risk is enough. I'll read it and suggest the next step.

Related Case Studies and Project Work

  1. Screenshot of the Nando’s website; part of John Kavanagh's selected project work.

    A Complete Migration and Replatform for Nando’s

    On Nando’s, moving from Drupal to Next.js and Vercel meant protecting routes, structured content, and searchcritical templates whilst the platform changed underneath.

    View case study
  2. Screenshot of the Virgin Atlantic & Holidays website; part of John Kavanagh's selected project work.

    A New Headless Platform for Virgin Atlantic & Holidays

    At Virgin Atlantic, migration work sat inside a hightraffic travel estate where sequencing, release control, and frontend stability mattered every week.

    View case study
  3. Screenshot of the IMG Licensing website; part of John Kavanagh's selected project work.

    An All‑New Identity and Website for IMG Licensing

    IMG Licensing's rebuild made publishing structure, page generation, and longterm maintainability simpler rather than heavier.

    View case study