Services

Next.js Site Broke After Deploy or Release

The release deployed successfully and the app still works locally, but the live site breaks against production data, config, runtime behaviour, or traffic.

Stabilise a Next.js production incident after deploy when the app works locally but the live site is now broken, inconsistent, or only failing against production conditions.

Short Answer

A successful deploy can still break a Next.js site when production data, environment variables, middleware, caching, or rendering behaviour differs from local assumptions. At that point the priority is not a broad refactor. It is finding the first failing production boundary, deciding whether rollback or a forward fix is safer, and stabilising the release.

Typical Symptoms

  • The deploy succeeded, but the live site started returning errors, missing content, or broken UI immediately afterwards.
  • The problem reproduces only in production or only against live data and configuration.
  • Teams are deciding between rollback and patching without a trusted diagnosis of what changed.

Likely Causes

  • Production runtime configuration, environment variables, or external dependencies differ from local assumptions.
  • The release changed route, middleware, caching, or rendering behaviour in ways that only show up in the live environment.
  • The platform has one productiononly boundary failing, but logs and symptoms make it look broader than it is.

What I Look at First

  • Reproduce one failing production route end to end and capture the first point where live behaviour diverges from the expected release path.
  • Whether the breakage is routespecific, sharedlayout, middleware, auth, or datasource related.
  • What changed in the release across dependencies, environment config, and runtime assumptions.

How I Help Fix This

  • Identify the production layer that is actually failing before changing unrelated code.
  • Choose containment, rollback, or forwardfix based on the real live risk.
  • Stabilise the site without creating a second production surprise.

When to Look at This

  • When the release succeeded technically but the live site is now broken enough to affect customers, editors, or revenue.
  • When the issue only reproduces in production and each attempted fix is increasing risk rather than reducing it.

What Gets Resolved

  • The productiononly break is traced across build, preview, environment, runtime, cache, middleware, and route differences.
  • The first real failure is separated from retry noise and downstream symptoms.
  • Local, preview, build, and production differences are made visible.
  • Environment, config, cache, runtime, and deployment behaviour are checked in order.
  • Fixes are prioritised so the team can ship with more confidence.

How This Usually Works

  1. Technical Diagnostic

    A focused review of affected routes, templates, deployment behaviour, crawl signals, CMS behaviour, performance bottlenecks, or code paths, followed by a prioritised fix plan the team can take into delivery.

  2. Recovery Sprint

    A short, concentrated engagement for a defined technical SEO, performance, CMS, Vercel, migration, or production issue where the business needs the cause isolated and the first fixes moved quickly.

  3. Embedded Delivery Support

    Senior handson support inside an existing team where architecture, implementation, review, and delivery judgement all matter, especially when the work cannot be handed over as isolated tickets.

Common Questions

How is this different from build failure debugging?
This page is for releases that already deployed. The problem is not getting the build through CI, but explaining why the live site broke afterwards under real production conditions.
Can you help if we cannot reproduce it locally?
Yes. Productiononly failures are common. The job is to narrow the incident to the first real production boundary that is failing rather than waiting for a perfect local reproduction before acting.

Talk to me about the problem

A short description of the affected route, error, or build log is enough. I'll read it and suggest the next step.

Related Case Studies and Project Work

  1. Screenshot of the Linkudo website; part of John Kavanagh's selected project work.

    A Reimagining of This Classic Word Association Web Game

    Linkudo is a live Next.js product where production behaviour, auth, and release reliability were designed from the start.

    View case study
  2. Screenshot of the Nando’s website; part of John Kavanagh's selected project work.

    A Complete Migration and Replatform for Nando’s

    On Nando’s, Vercel deployment behaviour sat alongside headless content, route generation, structured data, and livesite reliability.

    View case study